One verse

Srimad Bhagavatam 6.4.32

6.4.32

अस्तीति नास्तीति च वस्तुनिष्ठयो- रेकस्थयोर्भिन्नविरुद्धधर्मणो: । अवेक्षितं किञ्चन योगसाङ्ख्ययो: समं परं ह्यनुकूलं बृहत्तत् ॥ ३२ ॥

astiti nastiti ca vastu-nisthayor eka-sthayor bhinna-viruddha-dharmanoh aveksitam kincana yoga-sankhyayoh samam param hy anukulam brhat tat

asti
there is
iti
thus
na
not
asti
there is
iti
thus
ca
and
vastu-nisthayoh
professing knowledge of the ultimate cause
eka-sthayoh
with one and the same subject matter, establishing Brahman
bhinna
demonstrating different
viruddha-dharmanoh
and opposing characteristics
aveksitam
perceived
kincana
that something which
yoga-sankhyayoh
of mystic yoga and the Sankhya philosophy (analysis of the ways of nature)
samam
the same
param
transcendental
hi
indeed
anukulam
dwelling place
brhat tat
that ultimate cause

There are two parties—namely, the theists and the atheists. The theist, who accepts the Supersoul, finds the spiritual cause through mystic yoga. The Sankhyite, however, who merely analyzes the material elements, comes to a conclusion of impersonalism and does not accept a supreme cause—whether Bhagavan, Paramatma or even Brahman. Instead, he is preoccupied with the superfluous, external activities of material nature. Ultimately, however, both parties demonstrate the Absolute Truth because although they offer opposing statements, their object is the same ultimate cause. They are both approaching the same Supreme Brahman, to whom I offer my respectful obeisances.