One verse

Srimad Bhagavatam 10.55.40

10.55.40

यं वै मुहु: पितृसरूपनिजेशभावा- स्तन्मातरो यदभजन् रहरूढभावा: । चित्रं न तत् खलु रमास्पदबिम्बबिम्बे कामे स्मरेऽक्षविषये किमुतान्यनार्य: ॥ ४० ॥

yaṁ vai muhuḥ pitṛ-sarūpa-nijeśa-bhāvās tan-mātaro yad abhajan raha-rūḍha-bhāvāḥ citraṁ na tat khalu ramāspada-bimba-bimbe kāme smare ’kṣa-viṣaye kim utānya-nāryaḥ

yam
whom
vai
indeed
muhuḥ
repeatedly
pitṛ
His father
sa-rūpa
who exactly resembled
nija
as their own
īśa
master
bhāvāḥ
who thought of Him
tat
His
mātaraḥ
mothers
yat
inasmuch as
abhajan
they worshiped
raha
in privacy
rūḍha
full-blown
bhāvāḥ
whose ecstatic attraction
citram
amazing
na
not
tat
that
khalu
indeed
ramā
of the goddess of fortune
āspada
of the shelter (Lord Kṛṣṇa)
bimba
of the form
bimbe
who was the reflection
kāme
lust personified
smare
Cupid
akṣa-viṣaye
when He was before their eyes
kim uta
what then to speak of
anya
other
nāryaḥ
women

It is not astonishing that the palace women, who should have felt maternal affection for Pradyumna, privately felt ecstatic attraction for Him as if He were their own Lord. After all, the son exactly resembled His father. Indeed, Pradyumna was a perfect reflection of the beauty of Lord Kṛṣṇa, the shelter of the goddess of fortune, and appeared before their eyes as Cupid Himself. Since even those on the level of His mother felt conjugal attraction for Him, then what to speak of how other women felt when they saw Him?