One verse

Srimad Bhagavatam 11.28.25

11.28.25

समाहितै: क: करणैर्गुणात्मभि-र्गुणो भवेन्मत्सुविविक्तधाम्न: । विक्षिप्यमाणैरुत किं नु दूषणंघनैरुपेतैर्विगतै रवे: किम् ॥ २५ ॥

samāhitaiḥ kaḥ karaṇair guṇātmabhir guṇo bhaven mat-suvivikta-dhāmnaḥ vikṣipyamāṇair uta kiṁ nu dūṣaṇaṁ ghanair upetair vigatai raveḥ kim

samāhitaiḥ
which are perfectly concentrated in meditation
kaḥ
what
karaṇaiḥ
by senses
guṇa-ātmabhiḥ
which are basically manifestations of the modes of nature
guṇaḥ
virtue
bhavet
will be
mat
My
su-vivikta
who has properly ascertained
dhāmnaḥ
the personal identity
vikṣipyamāṇaiḥ
which are being agitated
uta
on the other hand
kim
what
nu
indeed
dūṣaṇam
blame
ghanaiḥ
by clouds
upetaiḥ
which have come
vigataiḥ
or which have gone away
raveḥ
of the sun
kim
what

For one who has properly realized My personal identity as the Supreme Godhead, what credit is there if his senses — mere products of the material modes — are perfectly concentrated in meditation? And on the other hand, what blame is incurred if his senses happen to become agitated? Indeed, what does it mean to the sun if the clouds come and go?